Landscape Ecology

of the

Makalu-Barun National Park and Conservation Area,

Eastern Nepal:

Vegetation and GIS Land Use/Land Cover Analysis

based upon Satellite Remote Sensing and Extensive Field Survey

Robert Zomer

Ph.D.Candidate
Ecology Graduate Group
University of California
Davis, CA, 95616, USA
rjzomer@ucdavis.edu

-------------------------

Graduate Advisors:

Dr. Jack Ives
Division of Environmental Science
University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

Dr. Susan Ustin
Center for Spatial Technologies and Remote Sensing
Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources
University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

Dr. John Menke
Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science
University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

Click here to see more images...

Abstract

The Makalu-Barun National Park and Conservation Area (MBNPCA) was established in 1992 to preserve unique biodiversity and endangered wilderness in Nepal, and the Himalaya. This unique mountainous area of over 2300 sq. km comprises the drainage extending from the Mt. Everest ecosystem (elev. 8000 m) to the Arun River Valley (elev. 300 m), encompassing an enormous diversity of species, habitats, and bioclimatic regions. The park management plan calls for sustainable development for the more than 32,000 agriculturalists living within the Conservation Area. Like many biosphere reserves in developing countries, managers lack reliable information. Remote sensing satellite imagery will be utilized to develop a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the MBNPCA. Landsat TM and SPOT digital imagery, and extensive vegetation and landuse field survey data collected on six research expeditions (1991-1994), will be used to classify and delineate vegetation-types, land-use, and wildlife habitat within the MBNPCA . A comparative baseline and initial information database will be developed.

Objectives

A Geographic Information System (GIS) for the Makalu-Barun National Park and Conservation Area (MBNPCA) based on land-cover type classes will be developed. Vegetation communities and forest structure will be surveyed, classified, and analyzed based upon an extensive set of georeferenced fieldwork data collected on six previous expedition to the MBNPCA. Stereoscopic SPOT satellite remote sensing data will be used to extract a digital elevation model (DEM), and a terrain corrected base map layer developed for the MBNPCA (accurate topographic map are currently not available). Landsat TM satellite multispectral data will be analyzed to determine vegetation/cover type, and incorporated into a GIS environment (ARC/INFO), along with vegetation and landuse field data. Other relevant data sets, as available, will be incorporated into the GIS environment. This augmented satellite remote sensing-based GIS will be used to:
  • Delineate, map, and analyze vegetation communities and land-use within the MBNPCA;
  • Delineate and quantify potential wildlife habitat, habitat quality, and habitat fragmentation, for several species of charismatic megafauna (e.g. red panda, snow leopard, musk deer), using a GIS modeling of known wildlife habitat relationships;
  • Establish a comparative baseline for future environmental and global change monitoring;
  • Develop an initial GIS resource management database for use by local resource managers faced with complex decisions;
  • Outline and demonstrate a cost-effective resource management methodology applicable to remote and rugged national parks and/or other biosphere reserves with limited resources.
  • Background:

    The design and management of national parks requires that policy makers and managers have access to both a broad base of information, and adequate analytical tools (Yonzon et al., 1991). In many parks, reliable information on park physical attributes, extent and type of vegetation , and land use patterns is lacking, due to physical remoteness and/or lack of funds and personnel for research. In this respect, Makalu-Barun National Park is typical of biosphere reserves in impoverished developing countries. By incorporating several recent technical advances with extensive field work and satellite remote sensing data, a cost-effective resource management and analysis methodology is proposed.

    Remote sensing provides an efficient and cost-effective method of acquiring up to date and accurate landscape and regional level information for use by resource planners. Global Positioning System (GPS) technology now offers an efficient and cost-effective ground truthing and land survey ability. In order to effectively utilize such information, however, resource managers need tools capable of quickly and efficiently updating and analyzing spatial data. GIS technology is a spatial database approach designed to meet these needs. Incorporating university-level field-research courses into GIS field data collection efforts is a cost-effective solution to acquiring the labor intensive field data required to develop an accurate GIS natural resource database, while providing unique field-research opportunities to college under-graduates.

    Study Area

    The Makalu-Barun National Park (est. 1992) and Conservation Area (MBNPCA) of Nepal , located on the eastern slope of the Mt. Everest ecosytem, is the most recent major conservation effort aimed at preserving biodiversity and threatened wilderness within the Himalaya. Habitats ranging from tropical monsoonal rain forests to alpine tundra and peaks reaching over 8000 m are located in close proximity . Over 3,000 species of flowering plants, including 25 of Nepal's 30 varieties of rhododendron, 48 primroses, 47 orchids, 19 bamboos, 15 oaks, 86 fodder trees and 67 economically valuable aromatic and medicinal plants have been reported (Polunin and Stainton, 1984; Stainton, 1988; Shrestha, 1989). Several species of endangered wildlife are found in the park as well, including red panda, musk deer, barking deer, ghoral, flying squirrel, thar, common leopard, and snow leopard. Bird fauna is rich and diverse, ranging from a wide diveristy of eagles and other raptors to white-necked storks and brilliantly colored sunbirds. Several species of endemic fish have been reported as well. The Barun Valley has been recognized for itÕs geographical uniqueness and species rich biodiversity, and classified a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Several investigators have categorized vegetation within the eastern Himalaya (Stainton, 1972; Dobremez, 1976; Numata, 1983, Schweinfurth, 1984; Shrestha, 1989; Schmidt-Vogt, 1990; Miehe, 1991). In addition to the high level of habitat and species diversity, the park also encompasses considerable cultural diversity and richness. More than 32,000 people live within the Conservation Area (approximately 830 sq. km), representing several distinct ethnic groups and languages. The vast majority are subsistence agriculturalists, either sedentary, swidden, or trans-humance pastoralists. Local peoples depend heavily upon adjacent natural resources (Ives and Messerli, 1989; Gilmour and Fisher, 1991; Brandon and Wells, 1992), including grazing and animal fodder collection, fuelwood and timber collection, and collection of medicinal and other economically valuable plants.

    SFSU Wildlands Studies - Nepal Program:

    The Wildlands Studies - Nepal Program (San Francisco State University Extension) serves as the primary focus for field work and ground-truthing activities detailed in this proposal. The Wildlands Studies Program conducts a university-accredited Environmental Field Studies course (nine semester-units) in the Makalu-Barun National Park. Incorporating this course into a larger research framework has both provided meaningful context to this unique field studies course, and offered opportunity for extended field study and intensive data collection. Robert Zomer (graduate student named in this proposal) is an instructor and coordinator for the program. To date, six successful courses have been completed, for a total of moe than 240 field days by 12 to 16 American college students and staff, along with substantial local support staff (including local experts, four local botany grad students (M.Sc.) from Tribhuvan University in Kathmandu, and porters and guides). The Wildlands Studies courses are self-supporting and cover most of the fieldwork expenses.

    Methodology

    Field Studies

    During six previous research expeditions to the MBNPCA: Preliminary cover classifications were determined through vegetation and landuse field surveys. Extensive field data was collected on 256 representative forest plots, as well as several dozen transects in alpine meadows. Vegetation patterns were recorded at stratified random field locations, using a methodology partly based upon, and congruent with, Shrestha et al. (1990) and his earlier work in the MBCP. Plots of 400 m2 were inventoried for all woody vegetation with stems greater 10 cm dbh. Percent cover of both the understory and canopy was estimated and characterized. Site parameters (elevation, slope, aspect, terrain) were determined. The nature and extent of landuse activities was categorized based upon observation and informal interviews. Global Positioning Receivers, with external antennas on 10 m collapsible poles, were used to estimate geographic coordinates for the plot. This geo-referenced plot data will be utilized as the training set in a supervised multispectral classification for the remote sensing data.

    Community Analysis

    Multivariate clustering techniques (Gauch, 1982), two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN), and canonical correspondence analysis (CANOCO) (Jongman et al., 1987) will be used to analyze community ecology, and determine, describe, and delineate vegetation classes.

    Image processing and analysis

    Stereoscopic SPOT MSS data will be used to extract a DEM and develop a terrain corrected digital base map, using PCI Satellite Orthorectification software. Landsat TM digital data (Sept. 1992) will be used as the primary data set for vegetation mapping. Other remote sensing data sets include Landsat MSS data from 1979, to add a temporal dimension to the analysis, and SPOT MSS data for added spatial resolution and to aid in identification of agricultural and settlement patterns.

    The ability to identify and evaluate landscape-level spatial and temporal processes has been greatly enhanced with the advent of satellite remote sensing. Satellite remote sensing has been used to map and classify landuse and vegetation cover classes in remote, inaccessible areas and mountainous regions (Frank, 1988; Lal et al., 1991), including Nepal (Blamont and M*ring, 1987). Inclusion of topographic data, has been shown to improve prediction accuracy significantly (Strahler et al., 1978, Talbot and Markon, 1986; Frank, 1988; Senoo et al. 1990). By incorporating the remote sensing data into a GIS before classification, other ancillary data sets may be utilized in a decision-making tree, or rule-induction approach to classification. This method was found useful in disturbed and hilly environments (Lees and Ritman, 1991).

    GIS development

    All remote sensing data will be incorporated as distinct layers within the GIS environment (ARC/INFO), and merged with GIS base map and ancillary data sets provided by ICIMOD (MENRIS). The extracted DEM will be used to aid in classification of land cover types. Field study data will utilized as a training set to produce a supervised multispectral classification based on all relevant data sets within the GIS. Ancillary data sets, as available, including census data, administrative boundaries, and socioeconomic data, will also be incorporated as distinct layers or georeferenced database information.

    Modeling and analysis of willdlife habitat

    Delineate and quantify potential wildlife habitat, habitat quality, and habitat fragmentation, for several species of charismatic megafauna (e.g. red panda, snow leopard, musk deer), using a GIS modeling of known wildlife habitat relationships. Potential and actual habitat has been modeled within a GIS environment for a diverse range of wildlife species (Tomlin et al., 1987; Young et al., 1987; Hodgsen et al. 1988; Agee et al., 1989, Prasad et al, 1992; Yonzon et al, 1991).
     

    References

    Agee, J.K. Stitt, S., Nyquist, M and Root, P. 1989. A geographic analysis of historical grizzly bear sightings in the North Cascades. Photogram Eng. Remote Sens. 54: 1601-1607.

    Blamont, D. and C. M*ring, 1987: Use of remote sensing for vegetation and landuse mapping in mountainous areas: The case of central Nepal. Adv. Space Res. 7(3): 41-46.

    Brandon, K.E. and M. Wells. 1992: Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas.. World Development. 20 (4): 557-570.

    Carpenter, C. and R. Zomer, 1996. Forest Ecology of the Makalu-Barun National Park and Conservation Area, Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 16 (2): 135-148.

    Dobremez, J.F. 1976: Le Nepal: ecologie et biog*ographie. Cahiers N*palais. Paris.

    Frank, T.D. 1988: Mapping Dominant Vegetation Communities in the Colorado Rocky Mountain Front Range with Landsat Thematic Mapper and Digital Terrain Data. Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(12): 1727-1734.

    Gauch, Jr, H.G., 1982: Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, 298 pp.

    Gilmour, D.A. and R.J. Fisher, 1991: Villagers, Forests and Forests: The philosophy, process and practice of community forestry in Nepal. Sahayogi Press. Kathmandu, Nepal. pp. 212.

    Hendrix, W.G., Fabos, J.G. and J.E. Price, 1988: An ecological approach to landscape planning using geographic information system technology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:211-225.

    Hodgson, M., Jensen, J., Mackey, H., and Coulter, M. 1988. Monitoring wood stork foraging habitat using remote sensing and geographic information systems. Photogram Eng. Remote Sens. 55: 1637-1642.

    Ives. J. D. and B. Messerli. 1989: The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation. The United Nations University. Routledge, New York.

    Jongman, R.H.G., ter Braak, C.J.F., and O.F.R. van Tongeren, 1987: Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pucdoc, Wageningen. 299 pp.

    Lal, J.B., Gulati, A.K. and M.S. Bist, 1991: Satellite mapping of alpine pastures in the Himalayas. Int. J Remote Sensing. 12 (3): 435-443.

    Langley, P.G. 1971. Earth resources information systems using satellites, aircraft and ground teams. Proc. of the Twenty-first Int. Astronautical Congress. North-Holland.

    Lees, B.G. and K. Ritman, 1991: Decision-tree and rule-induction approach to integration of remotely sensed and GIS data in mapping vegetation in disturbed or hilly environments. Environ. Management 15(6): 823-831.

    Miehe, G., 1991: The vegetation map of the Khumbu Himal (Mount Everest south slope) 1:50 000. Vegetation patterns and problems of mapping. Gefugemuster der Vegetation und Probleme der Kartierung. Erdkunde, 45(2), pp 81-94.

    Numata, M. 1983: Structure and dynamics of vegetation in eastern Nepal. Laboratory of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Chiba University, Japan. 184 pp.

    Polunin, O. and A. Stainton, 1984: Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, Delhi, India pp. 580.

    Prasad, S. N., Chundawat,R. S., Hunter, D. O, Panwar, H. S., Rawat, G. S., and G. J. Buhyoff, 1991: Remote sensing snow leopard habitat in the trans-Himalaya of India using spatial models and satellite imagery preliminary results. In: Resource Technology 90. Proc. second international symposium on advanced technology in natural resources management, Washington, DC, 1990. pp . 519-523.

    Senoo, T., Kobayashi, F., Tanaka, S., and T. Sugimura.. 1990: Improvement of forest type classification by SPOT HRV with 20 m mesh DTM. Int. J. Remote Sensing 11(6): 1011-1022.

    Shrestha, T.B. 1989: Development Ecology of the Arun River Basin in Nepal. International Centre For Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Shrestha, T.B., R. Sakya and H.S. Nepali, 1990: Scientific Report on field survey of 1989: General and Phyto-ecology Working paper No. 8, Makalu-Barun Conservation Project, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Stainton, A., 1988: Flowers of the Himalaya: A Supplement. Oxford University Press, Delhi, India. pp. 85.

    Stainton, J.D.A. 1972: Forests of Nepal. J. Murray Ltd. London. 181 pp.

    Strahler, A., Logan, T.L., and Bryant, N.A., 1978: Improving forest classification accuracy from Landsat by incorporating topographic data. In; Proc. Twelfth Int. Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment. Ann Arbor, Mich., p. 927-942.

    Talbot, S.S. and Markon, C.J. 1986: Vegetation mapping of Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska using Landsat MSS Digital Data. Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52 (6): 791-799.

    Tomlin, S.D., Berwick, S.H. and Tomlin, S.M. 1987. The use of computer pgaphics in deer habitat evaluation. In: Geographic Information Systems for Resource Management: A Compendium. Ripple W. (ed.) American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Falls Church, Va., p.145-156.

    Yonzon, P., Jones, R., and J. Fox, 1991: Geographic Information Systems for Assessing Habitat and Estimating Population of Red Pandas in Langtang National Park, Nepal. Ambio. 20(7): 285-288.

    Young, T.N. , Elby, J.R., Allen, H.L. Hewitt, M.J. and Dixooooon, K.R. 1987. Wildlife habitat analysis using Landsat and radiotelemetry in GIS with applicaton to spotted owl preference for old growth. In: Proc. of GIS '87 San Francisco. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Univ. of Calif. Berkeley, p. 595-600.

    Zomer, R. and J. Menke, 1993. Site Index and Biomass Productivity Estimates for Himalayan Alder - Large Cardamom Plantations: A Model Agroforestry System of the Eastern Mid-Hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 13 (3): 235-255.
     


    Back to Landscape Ecology of Makalu-Barun